Przejdź do głównej zawartości

In this post I would like to express my opinion on the article I have read entitled "Conspiracy theories: why are they thriving in the pandemic?" written by Rod Dacombe of King's College London. The article tells about conspiracy theories in the light of current world events.

I believe that conspiracy theories are extremely dangerous in today's world. We could notice their effects at the beginning of January in front of the US Capitol building. Through social media, which allows information to be spread rapidly, influence of conspiracy theories has increased. Additionally, they are strengthened by the global pandemic. The article presents statements of scientists and interesting observations on conspiracy theories. However, the author does not proposea specific solution to this problem and only suggests a change in the rules of the functioning of social media or that the government should take up the fight against disinformation. I think that some solutions should be introduced to limit their impact, but reconciling them with freedom of speech can be difficult. There is no doubt that this is a challenge for the politicians in the present decade. Conspiracy theories can be a real existential threat to modern democracy.

article:

https://theconversation.com/conspiracy-theories-why-are-they-thriving-in-the-pandemic-153657

Komentarze

  1. englishdiary9 lutego 2021 11:51

    A good post. Maybe instead of the details about the author (which can be checked if you open the link) you could add more about the main claims of the article itself next time?

    OdpowiedzUsuń

Prześlij komentarz

Popularne posty z tego bloga

Last Saturday, during a walk, I was approached by a man who was apparently looking for a way. He asked me if I knew where the horse stud was located. My automatic reply was "unfortunately no." A few seconds later, however, I came to the conclusion that i know where it was located, turned back and showed him the direction for which he thanked me. This situation made me wonder if the fact that I answered the first time without thinking was a symbol. People today have become more individualistic and have less contact with people in the real world. Perhaps my answer was simply due to the fact that I have never been to this stud and I know where it is only by accident, but this situation, (apart from the satisfaction of helping), also gave me lesson for future to watch out for antisocial reflexes, which may occur more frequent after lockdowns.
1 komentarz
Czytaj więcej
Last Saturday, I played a game in which I spent many long hours as a small child. I was hoping to travel back in time to those times when life was much simpler and more beautiful. Unfortunately, despite the emotions, the game turned out to be much worse than I remembered it. I guess that is just how human memory works, it writes down things from youth as cooler than they really were. Perhaps this game was never very good and I just remember it because it accompanied me in the happy moments of my life. Although I turned off this game after a short time and probably won't come back to it for a long time, I am glad I turned it on. Nostalgia is a very nice feeling and I hope that in some time I will remember my present experiences similarly.
1 komentarz
Czytaj więcej
ELECTORAL COLLEGE and its importance in the election process The election of the president of the United States is mediated by the Electoral College. It exists on the basis of the constitution and consists of 538 electors. Each state is free to select electors and their number equals the number of congressmen elected from a state. Under the 23rd Amendment, the District of Columbia received 3 electoral votes. Electoral College gives more importance to states that are less populated, so that candidates must gain wide support and not focus on the largest urban centers. However, there are many critics of this solution. They are concentrated mainly in the democratic party which has already been wronged by this system several times,. This happened in 2016 when Hilary Clinton received over 2% (2.87 million) more votes from Donald Trump and still lost the vote at Electoral College by 304-227 votes. In 2000, Democratic candidate Al Gore received over 0.5 million more votes than his competitor G...
1 komentarz
Czytaj więcej