Angielski

For me, current social distancing is neutral.   I understand the precautions that have been taken to prevent the virus and they don't cause me directly much trouble. I think it is very important to pull people apart in epidemic times. Being home all the time is not terrible for me. This solution is two-sided. There are obvious bad sides of this solution, but there are also good ones, such as the lack of loss of time for arriving and returning to school, and therefore more time for interest, study or spending time with the family. I think i am just a kind of person who likes staying at home so it do not affect me that much.

I.   If we want demonstrate that something is a fact using the scientific methode we need someone else not just the creator. We need a person who would be some kind of 'Advocatus Diaboli' which means that this person would trying to give arguments against our theory(hypothesis)or an invention. When the creator defends his work with logical and scientific arguments against an unfavorable side, then we can consider it true or a fact just something compatible with science.  This is how I understand the scientific method and prove the truth of inventions with its help. II. In my humble opinion, people have a natural tendency to believe in various types of conspiracy theories and supernatural things. I'm not a behaviorist, however, I think it may be because of instinct, because in the past, when science was not yet very developed people still had to explain the world around them and. In my opinion, this may also be due to the need to satisfy they rich imagination and the need...

Should Lydia's husband be arrested and tried as the person responsible for her death? In my humble opinion Lydia’s husband should be tried for her death. First of all, it must be noted that when Lydia’s husband left home he was sure that she is going to die. Since he knew that, he should call to an ambulance, because it was his moral duty. I could only imagine how hard was it for him to be in such a relationship. But it can not be an excuse for what he did or rather for what he did not do with that knowledge. That’s why I think he should be tried but it is up to judges what his destiny will be.