Przejdź do głównej zawartości

Neil DeGrasse Tyson The Scientific Method

I. If we want demonstrate that something is a fact using the scientific methode we need someone else not just the creator. We need a person who would be some kind of 'Advocatus Diaboli' which means that this person would trying to give arguments against our theory(hypothesis)or an invention. When the creator defends his work with logical and scientific arguments against an unfavorable side, then we can consider it true or a fact just something compatible with science. This is how I understand the scientific method and prove the truth of inventions with
its help.
II. In my humble opinion, people have a natural tendency to believe in various types of conspiracy theories and supernatural things. I'm not a behaviorist, however, I think it may be because of instinct, because in the past, when science was not yet very developed people still had to explain the world around them and. In my opinion, this may also be due to the need to satisfy they rich imagination and the need for a sense of superiority over others demonstrated in the belief that 'other people are gullible and naive but we think independently and know the true truth'.

Komentarze

  1. Ad.1 - I'd just add that you need not one but many Devil's Advocates to test a hypothesis.
    Ad.2 - Why should believing in something without any evidence give you a sense of superiority?

    OdpowiedzUsuń

Prześlij komentarz

Popularne posty z tego bloga

Last Saturday, during a walk, I was approached by a man who was apparently looking for a way. He asked me if I knew where the horse stud was located. My automatic reply was "unfortunately no." A few seconds later, however, I came to the conclusion that i know where it was located, turned back and showed him the direction for which he thanked me. This situation made me wonder if the fact that I answered the first time without thinking was a symbol. People today have become more individualistic and have less contact with people in the real world. Perhaps my answer was simply due to the fact that I have never been to this stud and I know where it is only by accident, but this situation, (apart from the satisfaction of helping), also gave me lesson for future to watch out for antisocial reflexes, which may occur more frequent after lockdowns.
Last Saturday, I played a game in which I spent many long hours as a small child. I was hoping to travel back in time to those times when life was much simpler and more beautiful. Unfortunately, despite the emotions, the game turned out to be much worse than I remembered it. I guess that is just how human memory works, it writes down things from youth as cooler than they really were. Perhaps this game was never very good and I just remember it because it accompanied me in the happy moments of my life. Although I turned off this game after a short time and probably won't come back to it for a long time, I am glad I turned it on. Nostalgia is a very nice feeling and I hope that in some time I will remember my present experiences similarly.
 In today's post I would like to describe the history of the election day in the USA. In 1845 Congress unified the election day for all states. Previously elections could take place within 34 days before the first Wednesday of December.  This change was made because of developing the telegraph in America, election results from one state could influence the votes of others.  It was decided that the elections should be held in November due to still relatively good weather and end of the harvest, which was crucial because then USA was still a strongly agricultural state.  Tuesday was chosen as voting day so voters could go to church on Sunday, arrive at the voting place (usually in a large city) on Monday, and vote ahead of Wednesday, which was a trading day for farmers. The change initially applied only to the presidential election later it was extended. Since then, elections in the states have been held every two years on the first Tuesday after November 1. Sources: h...