I. If we want demonstrate that something is a fact using the scientific methode we need someone else not just the creator. We need a person who would be some kind of 'Advocatus Diaboli' which means that this person would trying to give arguments against our theory(hypothesis)or an invention. When the creator defends his work with logical and scientific arguments against an unfavorable side, then we can consider it true or a fact just something compatible with science. This is how I understand the scientific method and prove the truth of inventions with
its help.
its help.
II. In my humble opinion, people have a natural tendency to believe in various types of conspiracy theories and supernatural things. I'm not a behaviorist, however, I think it may be because of instinct, because in the past, when science was not yet very developed people still had to explain the world around them and. In my opinion, this may also be due to the need to satisfy they rich imagination and the need for a sense of superiority over others demonstrated in the belief that 'other people are gullible and naive but we think independently and know the true truth'.
Ad.1 - I'd just add that you need not one but many Devil's Advocates to test a hypothesis.
OdpowiedzUsuńAd.2 - Why should believing in something without any evidence give you a sense of superiority?