Przejdź do głównej zawartości

Recently I read an article titled European Super League: Premier League's 'big six' agree to join new league. It was about a breakthrough in the Super League idea and reactions to it.


I am very surprised by such big opposition to this league. What made me even more interested in this resistance was that not only supporters groups and football associations object to it, but also Boris Johnson and Emmanuel Macron. Such a united front arouses my suspicions, especially given the corrupt past of football associations. In the age of social media and computer games, football has to be on the highest level to keep people interested. I think Super League is an interesting idea and could bring a new quality to this sport. Another expansion of the UEFA tournaments with new countries and teams (Euro 2012 had only 16 teams, Euro 2016 already 24, and in the coming years, apart from the Champions League and Europa League,  Conference League will be created) is actually beneficial only for associations activists.


https://www.bbc.com/sport/football/56795811

Komentarze

  1. I would never assume you'd care about football enough to read about it! You don't cease to surprise me.

    OdpowiedzUsuń

Prześlij komentarz

Popularne posty z tego bloga

Last Saturday, during a walk, I was approached by a man who was apparently looking for a way. He asked me if I knew where the horse stud was located. My automatic reply was "unfortunately no." A few seconds later, however, I came to the conclusion that i know where it was located, turned back and showed him the direction for which he thanked me. This situation made me wonder if the fact that I answered the first time without thinking was a symbol. People today have become more individualistic and have less contact with people in the real world. Perhaps my answer was simply due to the fact that I have never been to this stud and I know where it is only by accident, but this situation, (apart from the satisfaction of helping), also gave me lesson for future to watch out for antisocial reflexes, which may occur more frequent after lockdowns.
Last Saturday, I played a game in which I spent many long hours as a small child. I was hoping to travel back in time to those times when life was much simpler and more beautiful. Unfortunately, despite the emotions, the game turned out to be much worse than I remembered it. I guess that is just how human memory works, it writes down things from youth as cooler than they really were. Perhaps this game was never very good and I just remember it because it accompanied me in the happy moments of my life. Although I turned off this game after a short time and probably won't come back to it for a long time, I am glad I turned it on. Nostalgia is a very nice feeling and I hope that in some time I will remember my present experiences similarly.
 In today's post I would like to describe the history of the election day in the USA. In 1845 Congress unified the election day for all states. Previously elections could take place within 34 days before the first Wednesday of December.  This change was made because of developing the telegraph in America, election results from one state could influence the votes of others.  It was decided that the elections should be held in November due to still relatively good weather and end of the harvest, which was crucial because then USA was still a strongly agricultural state.  Tuesday was chosen as voting day so voters could go to church on Sunday, arrive at the voting place (usually in a large city) on Monday, and vote ahead of Wednesday, which was a trading day for farmers. The change initially applied only to the presidential election later it was extended. Since then, elections in the states have been held every two years on the first Tuesday after November 1. Sources: h...