Przejdź do głównej zawartości

In today's post, I would like to describe who the American politicians referred to as RINO or DINO are.


The acronym RINO stands for Republican In Name Only. It is used to describe politicians whose views are not conservative or simply different from the current party line. Similarly, DINO is used to define people who, despite belonging to a democratic party, have at least some conservative views. 


The fact that such persons exist results mainly from the majority electoral law that is in force in the USA and forces parties to represent a wide range of views. RINO or DINO may also be people who, due to failures in the opposite party moved to the other party or represent a given party in a state that has long been ruled by the opposing party.


The person generally regarded as RINO was the Republican presidential candidate in 2008 John McCain, while the DINO was called Joe Lieberman, Al Gore running mate in 2000 presidential elections.

Komentarze

  1. englishdiary11 listopada 2020 05:19

    Until very recently most politicians in the Democratic Party would be considered conservative by European standards (except in Poland perhaps). Now they do have a few true left-wingers (Bernie Sanders being the best known) but the majority of the party is still far from progressive in social terms.
    We have to remember that Americans are spooked by the very mention of socialism so the European version of conservatism, with its liberal approach to lifestyle issues (e.g. gay rights and abortion) and general acceptance of welfare state would be unacceptable for them.

    OdpowiedzUsuń

Prześlij komentarz

Popularne posty z tego bloga

Last Saturday, during a walk, I was approached by a man who was apparently looking for a way. He asked me if I knew where the horse stud was located. My automatic reply was "unfortunately no." A few seconds later, however, I came to the conclusion that i know where it was located, turned back and showed him the direction for which he thanked me. This situation made me wonder if the fact that I answered the first time without thinking was a symbol. People today have become more individualistic and have less contact with people in the real world. Perhaps my answer was simply due to the fact that I have never been to this stud and I know where it is only by accident, but this situation, (apart from the satisfaction of helping), also gave me lesson for future to watch out for antisocial reflexes, which may occur more frequent after lockdowns.
1 komentarz
Czytaj więcej
Last Saturday, I played a game in which I spent many long hours as a small child. I was hoping to travel back in time to those times when life was much simpler and more beautiful. Unfortunately, despite the emotions, the game turned out to be much worse than I remembered it. I guess that is just how human memory works, it writes down things from youth as cooler than they really were. Perhaps this game was never very good and I just remember it because it accompanied me in the happy moments of my life. Although I turned off this game after a short time and probably won't come back to it for a long time, I am glad I turned it on. Nostalgia is a very nice feeling and I hope that in some time I will remember my present experiences similarly.
1 komentarz
Czytaj więcej
ELECTORAL COLLEGE and its importance in the election process The election of the president of the United States is mediated by the Electoral College. It exists on the basis of the constitution and consists of 538 electors. Each state is free to select electors and their number equals the number of congressmen elected from a state. Under the 23rd Amendment, the District of Columbia received 3 electoral votes. Electoral College gives more importance to states that are less populated, so that candidates must gain wide support and not focus on the largest urban centers. However, there are many critics of this solution. They are concentrated mainly in the democratic party which has already been wronged by this system several times,. This happened in 2016 when Hilary Clinton received over 2% (2.87 million) more votes from Donald Trump and still lost the vote at Electoral College by 304-227 votes. In 2000, Democratic candidate Al Gore received over 0.5 million more votes than his competitor G...
1 komentarz
Czytaj więcej